BTCY.TO vs. MNU-U.TO
BTCY.TO (Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units) and MNU-U.TO (Purpose USD Cash Management ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCY.TO is a fund fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while MNU-U.TO is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BTCY.TO returned 25.28%/yr vs 4.82%/yr for MNU-U.TO. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BTCY.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BTCY.TO is traded in CAD, while MNU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MNU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCY.TO achieves a -28.08% return, which is significantly lower than MNU-U.TO's 2.42% return.
BTCY.TO
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -19.22%
- YTD
- -28.08%
- 6M
- -32.85%
- 1Y
- -41.31%
- 3Y*
- 25.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNU-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCY.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCY.TO Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units | -28.08% | -9.07% | 112.76% | 33.64% |
MNU-U.TO Purpose USD Cash Management ETF | 2.42% | -1.74% | 13.18% | 0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCY.TO and MNU-U.TO is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2023 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCY.TO vs. MNU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BTCY.TO
MNU-U.TO
BTCY.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units (BTCY.TO) and Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCY.TO | MNU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.16 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 1.04 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | 2.70 | -4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCY.TO | MNU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 | 0.91 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.85 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
BTCY.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCY.TO drawdown since its inception was -69.71%, which is greater than MNU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCY.TO and MNU-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCY.TO | MNU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.71% | -5.44% | -64.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.51% | -4.02% | -48.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.51% | -5.44% | -47.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.06% | -0.58% | -48.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -1.70% | -29.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.66% | 1.54% | +27.12% |
Volatility
BTCY.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units (BTCY.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO) at 0.83%. This indicates that BTCY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCY.TO | MNU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 0.83% | +9.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.93% | 3.46% | +36.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.14% | 4.59% | +42.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.82% | 5.28% | +45.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.82% | 5.28% | +45.54% |
Dividends
BTCY.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
BTCY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.77%, more than MNU-U.TO's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCY.TO Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units | 22.77% | 15.11% | 16.75% | 9.22% | 24.25% | 1.23% |
MNU-U.TO Purpose USD Cash Management ETF | 2.79% | 2.98% | 4.25% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCY.TO and MNU-U.TO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BTCY.TO and MNU-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer