PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCX-B.TO vs. XSB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCX-B.TO vs. XSB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCX-B.TO achieves a -30.26% return, which is significantly lower than XSB.TO's 1.28% return.


BTCX-B.TO

1D
-1.21%
1M
-19.90%
YTD
-30.26%
6M
-29.74%
1Y
-43.57%
3Y*
27.40%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*

XSB.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.25%
1Y
3.14%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCX-B.TO vs. XSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
-30.26%-11.32%139.01%149.40%-62.06%-18.60%
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
1.28%3.70%5.87%4.67%-4.04%-0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCX-B.TO and XSB.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCX-B.TO vs. XSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCX-B.TO
BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

XSB.TO
XSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCX-B.TO vs. XSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTCX-B.TOXSB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.31

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

2.14

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

7.09

-8.47

BTCX-B.TO vs. XSB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCX-B.TO and XSB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTCX-B.TO vs. XSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.26%, which is greater than XSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCX-B.TO and XSB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCX-B.TOXSB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.26%

-8.65%

-66.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.24%

-1.47%

-50.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.24%

-1.47%

-50.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.26%

-6.99%

-68.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.24%

-0.08%

-52.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-0.79%

-32.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.66%

0.44%

+31.22%

Volatility

BTCX-B.TO vs. XSB.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.04% compared to iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) at 0.51%. This indicates that BTCX-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCX-B.TOXSB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.04%

0.51%

+12.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.91%

1.63%

+32.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.49%

2.01%

+41.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.56%

2.72%

+50.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.87%

3.40%

+51.47%

BTCX-B.TO vs. XSB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCX-B.TO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XSB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCX-B.TO vs. XSB.TO - Dividend Comparison

BTCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
3.10%3.15%3.05%2.67%2.28%2.05%2.21%2.39%2.39%2.36%2.36%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCX-B.TO and XSB.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSB.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSB.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

BTCX-B.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XSB.TO is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO and 0.10% for XSB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCX-B.TO and XSB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer