PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCX-B.TO vs. XGD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCX-B.TO vs. XGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCX-B.TO achieves a -24.79% return, which is significantly lower than XGD.TO's 3.35% return.


BTCX-B.TO

1D
-2.37%
1M
-16.88%
YTD
-24.79%
6M
-30.42%
1Y
-38.32%
3Y*
34.38%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*

XGD.TO

1D
-2.80%
1M
1.62%
YTD
3.35%
6M
8.72%
1Y
67.78%
3Y*
43.11%
5Y*
22.30%
10Y*
14.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCX-B.TO vs. XGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
-24.79%-11.32%139.01%149.40%-62.06%-16.98%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
3.35%144.45%19.63%3.91%-3.10%4.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCX-B.TO and XGD.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCX-B.TO vs. XGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCX-B.TO
BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

XGD.TO
XGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCX-B.TO vs. XGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCX-B.TOXGD.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.90

1.59

-2.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.24

1.97

-3.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.28

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

2.35

-3.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.32

6.22

-7.54

BTCX-B.TO vs. XGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCX-B.TO and XGD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCX-B.TOXGD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

1.59

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.69

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.25

-0.17

Drawdowns

BTCX-B.TO vs. XGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.26%, roughly equal to the maximum XGD.TO drawdown of -72.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCX-B.TO and XGD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCX-B.TOXGD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.26%

-72.55%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.41%

-28.95%

-21.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.41%

-28.95%

-21.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.26%

-40.82%

-34.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.50%

-23.49%

-25.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.95%

-28.30%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.08%

10.93%

+18.15%

Volatility

BTCX-B.TO vs. XGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) is 9.83%, while iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) has a volatility of 14.43%. This indicates that BTCX-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCX-B.TOXGD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.83%

14.43%

-4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.96%

34.40%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.89%

42.86%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.13%

32.64%

+21.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.99%

33.38%

+21.61%

BTCX-B.TO vs. XGD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCX-B.TO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XGD.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCX-B.TO vs. XGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

BTCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
0.60%0.62%0.93%1.49%1.80%1.38%0.35%0.54%0.25%0.14%0.09%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCX-B.TO and XGD.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGD.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGD.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

BTCX-B.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XGD.TO is Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO and 0.61% for XGD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCX-B.TO and XGD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer