PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCX-B.TO vs. FXM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCX-B.TO vs. FXM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCX-B.TO achieves a -26.95% return, which is significantly lower than FXM.TO's 18.11% return.


BTCX-B.TO

1D
-2.81%
1M
-0.23%
6M
-17.61%
YTD
-26.95%
1Y
-44.02%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.32%

FXM.TO

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.42%
6M
14.60%
YTD
18.11%
1Y
45.40%
3Y*
27.60%
5Y*
19.13%
10Y*
14.71%
ALL TIME*
13.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$935.28KCA$1.05MCA$1.72M
CA$211.28KCA$184.82KCA$281.27K

BTCX-B.TO vs. FXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
-26.95%-11.32%139.01%149.40%-62.06%-18.60%
FXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF
18.11%38.54%30.05%5.79%-1.19%16.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCX-B.TO and FXM.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCX-B.TO vs. FXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTCX-B.TO
BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FXM.TO
FXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTCX-B.TO vs. FXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTCX-B.TOFXM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.75

-0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

5.51

-6.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

21.50

-22.81

BTCX-B.TO vs. FXM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the FXM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCX-B.TO and FXM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTCX-B.TO vs. FXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.26%, which is greater than FXM.TO's maximum drawdown of -46.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCX-B.TO and FXM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCX-B.TOFXM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.26%

-46.41%

-28.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.71%

-8.11%

-44.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.71%

-12.44%

-40.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.26%

-16.08%

-59.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.98%

-0.65%

-49.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.43%

-4.64%

-28.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.25%

2.08%

+33.17%

Volatility

BTCX-B.TO vs. FXM.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF (FXM.TO) at 2.53%. This indicates that BTCX-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCX-B.TOFXM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

2.53%

+5.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.34%

8.27%

+25.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.84%

11.25%

+32.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.26%

14.15%

+38.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.52%

16.88%

+37.64%

BTCX-B.TO vs. FXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCX-B.TO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FXM.TO's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCX-B.TO vs. FXM.TO - Dividend Comparison

BTCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Value Index ETF
1.72%1.91%2.17%2.96%2.18%2.19%2.40%2.04%2.52%1.70%1.83%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCX-B.TO and FXM.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FXM.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FXM.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

BTCX-B.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FXM.TO is Canada Equities. BTCX-B.TO tracks No Index (Physical Bitcoin), while FXM.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Target Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO and 0.64% for FXM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCX-B.TO and FXM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer