PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCX-B.TO vs. FLI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCX-B.TO vs. FLI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units) (FLI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCX-B.TO achieves a -24.79% return, which is significantly lower than FLI.TO's 3.96% return.


BTCX-B.TO

1D
-2.37%
1M
-16.88%
YTD
-24.79%
6M
-30.42%
1Y
-38.32%
3Y*
34.38%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*

FLI.TO

1D
-1.56%
1M
1.91%
YTD
3.96%
6M
7.77%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCX-B.TO vs. FLI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
-24.79%-11.32%139.01%149.40%-62.06%-16.98%
FLI.TO
CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units)
3.96%13.94%20.20%7.16%4.69%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCX-B.TO and FLI.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCX-B.TO vs. FLI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCX-B.TO
BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FLI.TO
FLI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FLI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FLI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCX-B.TO vs. FLI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units) (FLI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCX-B.TOFLI.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.90

1.10

-1.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.24

1.51

-2.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.20

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

1.51

-2.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.32

4.62

-5.94

BTCX-B.TO vs. FLI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the FLI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCX-B.TO and FLI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCX-B.TOFLI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

1.10

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.52

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.39

-0.31

Drawdowns

BTCX-B.TO vs. FLI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.26%, which is greater than FLI.TO's maximum drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCX-B.TO and FLI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCX-B.TOFLI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.26%

-56.31%

-18.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.41%

-10.00%

-40.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.41%

-12.65%

-37.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.26%

-17.81%

-57.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.50%

-2.68%

-45.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.95%

-7.55%

-25.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.08%

3.26%

+25.82%

Volatility

BTCX-B.TO vs. FLI.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units) (FLI.TO) at 3.56%. This indicates that BTCX-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCX-B.TOFLI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.83%

3.56%

+6.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.96%

10.23%

+23.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.89%

13.75%

+29.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.13%

18.57%

+35.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.99%

23.63%

+31.36%

Dividends

BTCX-B.TO vs. FLI.TO - Dividend Comparison

BTCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLI.TO
CI U.S. & Canada Lifeco Covered Call ETF (Hedged Common Units)
7.52%6.63%6.36%7.23%7.43%6.52%11.67%6.18%7.23%5.05%5.68%5.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCX-B.TO and FLI.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCX-B.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FLI.TO is Derivative Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCX-B.TO and FLI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer