BTCX-B.TO vs. CSAV.TO
BTCX-B.TO (CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units) and CSAV.TO (CI High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCX-B.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the No Index (Physical Bitcoin), while CSAV.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by CI. BTCX-B.TO is passively managed, while CSAV.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTCX-B.TO returned 11.20%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for CSAV.TO. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BTCX-B.TO charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CSAV.TO.
Performance
BTCX-B.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCX-B.TO achieves a -26.95% return, which is significantly lower than CSAV.TO's 1.18% return.
BTCX-B.TO
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- -17.61%
- YTD
- -26.95%
- 1Y
- -44.02%
- 3Y*
- 30.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.32%
CSAV.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$935.28K | CA$1.05M | CA$1.72M | |
CSAV.TO CI High Interest Savings ETF | CA$1.49M | CA$1.26M | CA$1.48M |
BTCX-B.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units | -26.95% | -11.32% | 139.01% | 149.40% | -62.06% | -18.60% |
CSAV.TO CI High Interest Savings ETF | 1.18% | 2.54% | 4.43% | 5.04% | 2.29% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCX-B.TO and CSAV.TO is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCX-B.TO vs. CSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BTCX-B.TO
CSAV.TO
BTCX-B.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCX-B.TO | CSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -21.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 4.54 | -3.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 108.77 | -109.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 301.45 | -302.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCX-B.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.26%, which is greater than CSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCX-B.TO and CSAV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCX-B.TO | CSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.26% | -0.02% | -75.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.71% | -0.02% | -52.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.71% | -0.02% | -52.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.26% | -0.02% | -75.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.98% | 0.00% | -49.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.43% | 0.00% | -33.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.25% | 0.01% | +35.24% |
Volatility
BTCX-B.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO) at 0.07%. This indicates that BTCX-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCX-B.TO | CSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 0.07% | +8.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.34% | 0.18% | +33.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.84% | 0.25% | +43.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.26% | 0.28% | +51.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.52% | 0.27% | +54.25% |
BTCX-B.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCX-B.TO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CSAV.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCX-B.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison
BTCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSAV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSAV.TO CI High Interest Savings ETF | 2.16% | 2.53% | 4.40% | 4.90% | 2.15% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCX-B.TO and CSAV.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSAV.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSAV.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.
BTCX-B.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CSAV.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO and 0.15% for CSAV.TO.
Find the right allocation for BTCX-B.TO and CSAV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer