BTCW vs. WGMI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTCW is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. Over the past year, BTCW returned -44.53% vs 119.73% for WGMI. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BTCW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.

Performance

BTCW vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -28.33% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 34.47% return.

BTCW

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: 2.34%
• 6M: -25.06%
• YTD: -28.33%
• 1Y: -44.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.76%

WGMI

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -3.25%
• 6M: 14.20%
• YTD: 34.47%
• 1Y: 119.73%
• 3Y*: 49.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	$1.20M	$1.71M	$1.37M
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	$36.52M	$32.75M	$41.50M

BTCW vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	-28.33%	-6.05%	92.79%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	34.47%	72.47%	28.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCW and WGMI is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.61

The correlation between BTCW and WGMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTCW vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTCW

BTCW Risk / Return Rank: 1
BTCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BTCW Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 51
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTCW vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCW	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.05	1.25	-2.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.59	1.95	-3.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.23	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	2.05	-2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	3.96	-5.30

BTCW vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCW Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCW and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCW vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -53.37%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCW	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.37%	-85.76%	+32.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.37%	-50.94%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.05%	-28.63%	-21.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.19%	-41.97%	+23.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.63%	26.29%	+8.34%

Volatility

BTCW vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) is 9.16%, while CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 35.22%. This indicates that BTCW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCW	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.16%	35.22%	-26.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.66%	61.62%	-27.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.25%	83.14%	-38.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.47%	82.40%	-32.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.47%	82.40%	-32.93%

BTCW vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCW vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCW nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCW and WGMI in my portfolio?

BTCW and WGMI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCW or WGMI?

WGMI has higher volatility (35.22%) compared to BTCW (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -53.37% vs WGMI's -85.76%.

Which ETF is better, BTCW or WGMI?

On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 119.73% vs -44.53% for BTCW. On fees, BTCW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BTCW has been the lower-risk option at 9.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCW or WGMI?

Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 119.73% return vs -44.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCW or WGMI?

BTCW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCW or WGMI?

BTCW and WGMI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BTCW and WGMI?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BTCW and 0.75% for WGMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.