BTCW vs. WGMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI).
BTCW and WGMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTCW is managed by WisdomTree. It was launched on Jan 11, 2024. WGMI is an actively managed fund by Valkyrie. It was launched on Feb 7, 2022.
Performance
BTCW vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BTCW vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | -22.24% | -6.05% | 100.00% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | -8.91% | 72.47% | 41.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -22.24% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's -8.91% return.
BTCW
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -22.24%
- 6M
- -42.12%
- 1Y
- -19.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WGMI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -13.78%
- YTD
- -8.91%
- 6M
- -22.65%
- 1Y
- 155.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BTCW vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BTCW vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank
BTCW
WGMI
BTCW vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | 2.00 | -2.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | 2.48 | -2.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.29 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 3.40 | -3.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 7.40 | -8.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 2.00 | -2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.08 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCW and WGMI is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BTCW vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTCW nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
BTCW vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and WGMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.29% | -85.76% | +36.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.29% | -50.94% | +1.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.80% | -47.10% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.16% | -43.87% | +29.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.23% | 23.36% | -0.13% |
Volatility
BTCW vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) is 12.82%, while Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 23.09%. This indicates that BTCW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BTCW | WGMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.82% | 23.09% | -10.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.58% | 60.97% | -24.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.26% | 78.21% | -32.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.13% | 82.07% | -30.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.13% | 82.07% | -30.94% |