BTCW vs. NTSX
BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCW is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by WisdomTree, while NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past year, BTCW returned -47.58% vs 20.75% for NTSX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCW charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for NTSX.
Performance
BTCW vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -29.13% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 8.18% return.
BTCW
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- 6M
- -32.18%
- YTD
- -29.13%
- 1Y
- -47.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 20.75%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
BTCW vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | -29.13% | -6.05% | 92.79% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 8.18% | 18.82% | 19.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCW and NTSX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCW vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank
BTCW
NTSX
BTCW vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCW | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.29 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 2.27 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 9.55 | -11.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCW vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -53.37%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and NTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCW | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.37% | -31.34% | -22.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.37% | -9.16% | -44.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.60% | -1.45% | -49.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | -6.73% | -10.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.68% | 2.18% | +30.50% |
Volatility
BTCW vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison
Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) has a higher volatility of 11.38% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 4.04%. This indicates that BTCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCW | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.38% | 4.04% | +7.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.65% | 10.58% | +24.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.17% | 12.98% | +31.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 17.18% | +32.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 18.25% | +31.59% |
BTCW vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCW vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison
BTCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.09% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCW and NTSX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCW has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to NTSX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -53.37% vs NTSX's -31.34%.
On 1-year performance, NTSX leads with 20.75% vs -47.58% for BTCW. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 20.75% return vs -47.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BTCW.
NTSX has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.00% for BTCW.
BTCW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.20% for NTSX.
NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCW and NTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer