BTCW vs. GDE
BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCW is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by WisdomTree, while GDE is a Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past year, BTCW returned -39.49% vs 54.50% for GDE. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCW charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GDE.
Performance
BTCW vs. GDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -27.48% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 11.25% return.
BTCW
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- -22.18%
- YTD
- -27.48%
- 6M
- -31.47%
- 1Y
- -39.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDE
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 54.50%
- 3Y*
- 47.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCW vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | -27.48% | -6.05% | 100.00% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 11.25% | 73.76% | 48.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCW and GDE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCW vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank
BTCW
GDE
BTCW vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCW | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.35 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 2.42 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 7.50 | -8.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCW | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 1.93 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 1.17 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
BTCW vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -49.45%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and GDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCW | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.45% | -32.01% | -17.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.45% | -22.66% | -26.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.45% | -9.99% | -39.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -7.89% | -8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.57% | 7.29% | +21.28% |
Volatility
BTCW vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison
Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 6.68%. This indicates that BTCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCW | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.14% | 6.68% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.72% | 24.27% | +9.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.57% | 28.41% | +15.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.09% | 26.12% | +23.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.09% | 26.12% | +23.97% |
BTCW vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCW vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison
BTCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 3.88% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCW and GDE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCW has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to GDE (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -49.45% vs GDE's -32.01%.
On 1-year performance, GDE leads with 54.50% vs -39.49% for BTCW. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GDE has performed better with a 54.50% return vs -39.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BTCW.
GDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 0.00% for BTCW.
BTCW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GDE is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.20% for GDE.
GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCW and GDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer