PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCW vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCW vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -27.48% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 11.25% return.


BTCW

1D
-2.81%
1M
-22.18%
YTD
-27.48%
6M
-31.47%
1Y
-39.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDE

1D
1.33%
1M
2.08%
YTD
11.25%
6M
13.51%
1Y
54.50%
3Y*
47.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCW vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTCW
Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund
-27.48%-6.05%100.00%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
11.25%73.76%48.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCW and GDE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCW vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCW
BTCW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCW vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCWGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.35

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

2.42

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

7.50

-8.89

BTCW vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCW Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCW and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCWGDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

1.93

-2.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

1.17

-0.89

Drawdowns

BTCW vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -49.45%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCWGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.45%

-32.01%

-17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.45%

-22.66%

-26.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.45%

-9.99%

-39.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.05%

-7.89%

-8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.57%

7.29%

+21.28%

Volatility

BTCW vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 6.68%. This indicates that BTCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCWGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

6.68%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.72%

24.27%

+9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.57%

28.41%

+15.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.09%

26.12%

+23.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.09%

26.12%

+23.97%

BTCW vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCW vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

BTCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BTCW
Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
3.88%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCW and GDE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCW has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to GDE (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -49.45% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 1-year performance, GDE leads with 54.50% vs -39.49% for BTCW. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDE has performed better with a 54.50% return vs -39.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BTCW.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 0.00% for BTCW.

BTCW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GDE is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.20% for GDE.

GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCW and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer