BTCW vs. ETH
BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and ETH (Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Over the past year, BTCW returned -47.58% vs -40.47% for ETH. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTCW charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ETH.
Performance
BTCW vs. ETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -29.13% return, which is significantly higher than ETH's -39.81% return.
BTCW
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- 6M
- -32.18%
- YTD
- -29.13%
- 1Y
- -47.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETH
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- 6M
- -42.37%
- YTD
- -39.81%
- 1Y
- -40.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCW vs. ETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | -29.13% | -6.05% | 36.01% |
ETH Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF | -39.81% | -10.89% | -4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCW and ETH is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BTCW and ETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCW vs. ETH — Risk / Return Rank
BTCW
ETH
BTCW vs. ETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCW | ETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.93 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.60 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | -0.95 | -0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCW vs. ETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -53.37%, smaller than the maximum ETH drawdown of -67.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and ETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCW | ETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.37% | -67.52% | +14.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.37% | -67.52% | +14.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.60% | -62.93% | +12.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | -34.33% | +16.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.68% | 42.77% | -10.09% |
Volatility
BTCW vs. ETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) is 11.38%, while Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH) has a volatility of 16.04%. This indicates that BTCW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCW | ETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.38% | 16.04% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.65% | 46.99% | -12.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.17% | 68.23% | -24.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 71.85% | -22.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 71.85% | -22.01% |
BTCW vs. ETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ETH's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCW vs. ETH - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTCW nor ETH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCW and ETH have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETH has higher volatility (16.04%) compared to BTCW (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -53.37% vs ETH's -67.52%.
On 1-year performance, ETH leads with -40.47% vs -47.58% for BTCW. On fees, ETH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BTCW has been the lower-risk option at 11.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETH has performed better with a -40.47% return vs -47.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BTCW.
BTCW and ETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.15% for ETH.
ETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCW and ETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer