BTCW vs. ETH
BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and ETH (Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Over the past year, BTCW returned -39.83% vs -27.60% for ETH. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTCW charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ETH.
Performance
BTCW vs. ETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -28.98% return, which is significantly higher than ETH's -43.73% return.
BTCW
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -28.98%
- 6M
- -29.03%
- 1Y
- -39.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETH
- 1D
- -4.13%
- 1M
- -19.44%
- YTD
- -43.73%
- 6M
- -43.65%
- 1Y
- -27.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCW vs. ETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | -28.98% | -6.05% | 36.01% |
ETH Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF | -43.73% | -10.89% | -4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCW and ETH is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BTCW and ETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCW vs. ETH — Risk / Return Rank
BTCW
ETH
BTCW vs. ETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCW | ETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.98 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | -0.41 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | -0.69 | -0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCW vs. ETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -52.10%, smaller than the maximum ETH drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and ETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCW | ETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.10% | -67.19% | +15.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.10% | -67.19% | +15.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -65.34% | +14.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.79% | -33.50% | +16.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.54% | 40.15% | -9.61% |
Volatility
BTCW vs. ETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) is 13.13%, while Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH) has a volatility of 19.75%. This indicates that BTCW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCW | ETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 19.75% | -6.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.47% | 46.93% | -12.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.10% | 69.05% | -24.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.09% | 72.37% | -22.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.09% | 72.37% | -22.28% |
BTCW vs. ETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ETH's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCW vs. ETH - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTCW nor ETH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCW and ETH have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETH has higher volatility (19.75%) compared to BTCW (13.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -52.10% vs ETH's -67.19%.
On 1-year performance, ETH leads with -27.60% vs -39.83% for BTCW. On fees, ETH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BTCW has been the lower-risk option at 13.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETH has performed better with a -27.60% return vs -39.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BTCW.
BTCW and ETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.15% for ETH.
ETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCW and ETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer