BTCW vs. CSHP
BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCW is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by WisdomTree, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past year, BTCW returned -39.83% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCW charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
BTCW vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -28.98% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.83% return.
BTCW
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -28.98%
- 6M
- -29.03%
- 1Y
- -39.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCW vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | -28.98% | -6.05% | 43.70% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.83% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCW and CSHP is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.07 |
The correlation between BTCW and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCW vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
BTCW
CSHP
BTCW vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCW | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -28.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 6.46 | -5.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 65.45 | -66.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 381.67 | -382.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCW vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -52.10%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCW | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.10% | -0.08% | -52.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.10% | -0.06% | -52.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -0.04% | -50.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.79% | -0.00% | -16.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.54% | 0.01% | +30.53% |
Volatility
BTCW vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that BTCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCW | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 0.16% | +12.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.47% | 0.27% | +34.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.10% | 0.36% | +43.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.09% | 0.41% | +49.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.09% | 0.41% | +49.68% |
BTCW vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCW vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
BTCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCW and CSHP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCW has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -52.10% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.94% vs -39.83% for BTCW. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.94% return vs -39.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BTCW.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for BTCW.
BTCW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCW and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer