BTCI vs. MLPI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI).

BTCI and MLPI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTCI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Oct 16, 2024. MLPI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Dec 17, 2025.

Performance

BTCI vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BTCI vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-20.30%	2.82%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.27%	0.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -20.30% return, which is significantly lower than MLPI's 17.27% return.

BTCI

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 3.84%
• YTD: -20.30%
• 6M: -36.82%
• 1Y: -13.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPI

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 17.27%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCI vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

BTCI

NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF

MLPI

Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF

Return for Risk

BTCI vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 7
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCI vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCI	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCI	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	7.48	-7.47

Correlation

The correlation between BTCI and MLPI is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BTCI vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.61%, more than MLPI's 3.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	43.61%	36.46%	6.76%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	3.49%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BTCI vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCI	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.98%	-2.78%	-42.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.07%	-1.19%	-39.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.77%	-0.60%	-12.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTCI	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.07%	11.12%	+28.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.41%	11.12%	+30.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.41%	11.12%	+30.29%