BTCE.DE vs. SWDA.L
BTCE.DE (ETC Group Physical Bitcoin) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCE.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ETC Issuance, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. BTCE.DE is actively managed, while SWDA.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTCE.DE returned 10.38%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for SWDA.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCE.DE charges 2.00%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
BTCE.DE vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BTCE.DE is traded in EUR, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCE.DE achieves a -27.02% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 8.47% return.
BTCE.DE
- 1D
- -3.79%
- 1M
- -18.81%
- YTD
- -27.02%
- 6M
- -28.97%
- 1Y
- -41.88%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
BTCE.DE vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCE.DE ETC Group Physical Bitcoin | -27.02% | -18.20% | 125.79% | 146.52% | -63.89% | 81.36% | 162.37% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.01% | 6.76% | 26.95% | 20.08% | -13.06% | 31.68% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCE.DE and SWDA.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCE.DE vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
BTCE.DE
SWDA.L
BTCE.DE vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCE.DE | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.36 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 3.27 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 13.21 | -14.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCE.DE vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCE.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -41.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCE.DE and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCE.DE | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.62% | -41.36% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.76% | -6.53% | -43.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.76% | -20.55% | -29.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.62% | -20.55% | -54.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.27% | -2.61% | -46.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.26% | -8.78% | -21.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.52% | 1.62% | +26.90% |
Volatility
BTCE.DE vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.82% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.47%. This indicates that BTCE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCE.DE | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.82% | 2.47% | +7.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.25% | 7.74% | +23.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.81% | 11.00% | +28.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.58% | 14.09% | +38.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.83% | 15.24% | +42.59% |
BTCE.DE vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCE.DE has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCE.DE vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTCE.DE nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCE.DE and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.00% for BTCE.DE.
BTCE.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: ETC Issuance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.00% for BTCE.DE and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for BTCE.DE and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer