PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCE.DE vs. SETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCE.DE vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BTCE.DE is traded in EUR, while SETH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SETH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCE.DE achieves a -27.02% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 44.74% return.


BTCE.DE

1D
-3.79%
1M
-21.28%
YTD
-27.02%
6M
-31.67%
1Y
-41.65%
3Y*
28.04%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*

SETH

1D
1.41%
1M
33.37%
YTD
44.74%
6M
49.44%
1Y
-1.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCE.DE vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BTCE.DE
ETC Group Physical Bitcoin
-27.02%-18.20%125.79%18.94%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
44.74%-37.79%-46.26%-25.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCE.DE and SETH is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

-0.58

The correlation between BTCE.DE and SETH shifts across timeframes, from -0.68 (1 year) to -0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCE.DE vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCE.DE
BTCE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTCE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SETH
SETH Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCE.DE vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCE.DESETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.05

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.03

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

-0.04

-1.42

BTCE.DE vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCE.DE Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCE.DE and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCE.DESETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

-0.02

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

-0.47

+1.05

Drawdowns

BTCE.DE vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCE.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -82.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCE.DE and SETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCE.DESETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.62%

-82.53%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.76%

-56.52%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.27%

-64.05%

+14.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.28%

-56.53%

+26.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.52%

36.24%

-7.72%

Volatility

BTCE.DE vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) have volatilities of 9.82% and 9.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCE.DESETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.82%

9.97%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.25%

46.26%

-15.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.81%

69.70%

-29.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.58%

70.10%

-17.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.85%

70.10%

-12.25%

BTCE.DE vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCE.DE has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCE.DE vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

BTCE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.75%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BTCE.DE
ETC Group Physical Bitcoin
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
10.75%7.01%3.44%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCE.DE and SETH have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.00% for BTCE.DE.

They also come from different issuers: ETC Issuance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 2.00% for BTCE.DE and 0.95% for SETH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCE.DE and SETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer