BTCE.DE vs. CBOL
BTCE.DE (ETC Group Physical Bitcoin) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCE.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ETC Issuance, while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTCE.DE charges 2.00%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.
Performance
BTCE.DE vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BTCE.DE is traded in EUR, while CBOL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CBOL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCE.DE achieves a -27.02% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -1.00% return.
BTCE.DE
- 1D
- -3.79%
- 1M
- -21.28%
- YTD
- -27.02%
- 6M
- -31.67%
- 1Y
- -41.65%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- —
CBOL
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCE.DE vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCE.DE ETC Group Physical Bitcoin | -27.02% | -22.86% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | -1.00% | -3.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCE.DE and CBOL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCE.DE vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank
BTCE.DE
CBOL
BTCE.DE vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCE.DE | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCE.DE | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | -1.09 | +1.68 |
Drawdowns
BTCE.DE vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCE.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -6.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCE.DE and CBOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCE.DE | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.62% | -6.80% | -67.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.27% | -4.68% | -44.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.28% | -3.68% | -26.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.52% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCE.DE vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCE.DE | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.81% | 6.51% | +33.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.58% | 6.51% | +46.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.85% | 6.51% | +51.34% |
BTCE.DE vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCE.DE has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCE.DE vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison
BTCE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTCE.DE ETC Group Physical Bitcoin | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.83% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCE.DE and CBOL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.00% for BTCE.DE.
BTCE.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ETC Issuance and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 2.00% for BTCE.DE and 0.79% for CBOL.
Find the right allocation for BTCE.DE and CBOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer