PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCC vs. ARKD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCC vs. ARKD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BTCC

1D
-2.53%
1M
-15.87%
YTD
-20.81%
6M
-22.94%
1Y
-33.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARKD

1D
-1.44%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC vs. ARKD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BTCC and ARKD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCC vs. ARKD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC
BTCC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC vs. ARKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCCARKDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

BTCC vs. ARKD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCCARKDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.72

-0.25

-0.47

Drawdowns

BTCC vs. ARKD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, which is greater than ARKD's maximum drawdown of -14.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC and ARKD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCCARKDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.40%

-14.03%

-30.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.44%

-4.51%

-34.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-6.21%

-9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.87%

Volatility

BTCC vs. ARKD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCCARKDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.92%

19.81%

+13.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.68%

19.81%

+11.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.68%

19.81%

+11.87%

BTCC vs. ARKD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKD's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCC vs. ARKD - Dividend Comparison

BTCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.03%, while ARKD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BTCC and ARKD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTCC is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTCC is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.

BTCC has the higher dividend yield at 105.03%, compared with 0.00% for ARKD.

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BTCC and 0.90% for ARKD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCC and ARKD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer