PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCC.TO vs. PSU-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCC.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BTCC.TO is traded in CAD, while PSU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC.TO achieves a -28.70% return, which is significantly lower than PSU-U.TO's 2.45% return.


BTCC.TO

1D
-2.61%
1M
-22.44%
YTD
-28.70%
6M
-32.68%
1Y
-41.59%
3Y*
31.34%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*

PSU-U.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
2.35%
YTD
2.45%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTCC.TO
Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units
-28.70%-9.18%116.50%149.22%-65.78%-7.04%
PSU-U.TO
Purpose US Cash Fund
2.45%-1.75%12.58%1.64%8.73%0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCC.TO and PSU-U.TO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2021

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCC.TO vs. PSU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC.TO
BTCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

PSU-U.TO
PSU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PSU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCC.TOPSU-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.18

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

1.10

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

2.85

-4.27

BTCC.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the PSU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC.TO and PSU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCC.TOPSU-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

0.98

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.89

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.46

-0.42

Drawdowns

BTCC.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.80%, which is greater than PSU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC.TO and PSU-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCC.TOPSU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.80%

-16.93%

-60.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.64%

-4.07%

-46.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.64%

-5.47%

-45.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.80%

-5.47%

-72.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.64%

-0.59%

-50.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-4.86%

-29.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.24%

1.57%

+27.67%

Volatility

BTCC.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO) at 0.80%. This indicates that BTCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCC.TOPSU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

0.80%

+8.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.46%

3.43%

+30.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.35%

4.58%

+38.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.44%

6.32%

+49.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.80%

6.56%

+50.24%

BTCC.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PSU-U.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCC.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

BTCC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BTCC.TO
Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSU-U.TO
Purpose US Cash Fund
2.70%2.90%3.65%3.87%1.45%0.29%0.41%1.70%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCC.TO and PSU-U.TO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PSU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTCC.TO.

BTCC.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while PSU-U.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTCC.TO and 0.17% for PSU-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCC.TO and PSU-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer