BTCC.TO vs. PLTR
BTCC.TO (Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BTCC.TO returned 8.55%/yr vs 42.05%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTCC.TO vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BTCC.TO is traded in CAD, while PLTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PLTR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCC.TO achieves a -29.50% return, which is significantly lower than PLTR's -25.59% return.
BTCC.TO
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -19.17%
- YTD
- -29.50%
- 6M
- -29.77%
- 1Y
- -41.35%
- 3Y*
- 26.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -4.12%
- YTD
- -25.59%
- 6M
- -32.01%
- 1Y
- -3.67%
- 3Y*
- 103.32%
- 5Y*
- 42.05%
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC.TO vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units | -29.50% | -9.18% | 116.50% | 149.22% | -65.78% | -13.94% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -25.59% | 124.30% | 377.77% | 161.08% | -62.51% | -30.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCC.TO and PLTR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCC.TO vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
BTCC.TO
PLTR
BTCC.TO vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCC.TO | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.03 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.14 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -0.24 | -1.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCC.TO vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.80%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC.TO and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCC.TO | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.80% | -83.57% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.17% | -39.63% | -13.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.17% | -41.05% | -12.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.80% | -77.89% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.19% | -37.62% | -13.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -39.52% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.10% | 22.58% | +8.52% |
Volatility
BTCC.TO vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) is 13.02%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.57%. This indicates that BTCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCC.TO | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.02% | 17.57% | -4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.15% | 38.84% | -4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.76% | 51.12% | -7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.12% | 65.45% | -10.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.36% | 69.77% | -13.41% |
Dividends
BTCC.TO vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTCC.TO nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCC.TO and PLTR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BTCC.TO and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer