PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCC.TO vs. MNY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCC.TO vs. MNY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC.TO achieves a -26.80% return, which is significantly lower than MNY.TO's 0.95% return.


BTCC.TO

1D
-2.83%
1M
-18.68%
YTD
-26.80%
6M
-31.17%
1Y
-40.83%
3Y*
29.76%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*

MNY.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.22%
1Y
2.59%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC.TO vs. MNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BTCC.TO
Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units
-26.80%-9.18%116.50%149.22%-18.53%
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund
0.95%3.03%4.69%5.03%1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCC.TO and MNY.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCC.TO vs. MNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC.TO
BTCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

MNY.TO
MNY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC.TO vs. MNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCC.TOMNY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-53.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

22.32

-21.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

65.02

-65.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

605.87

-607.27

BTCC.TO vs. MNY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 16.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC.TO and MNY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCC.TOMNY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

16.08

-17.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

11.02

-10.97

Drawdowns

BTCC.TO vs. MNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.80%, which is greater than MNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC.TO and MNY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCC.TOMNY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.80%

-0.24%

-77.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.04%

-0.04%

-50.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.04%

-0.10%

-49.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.32%

0.00%

-49.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

-0.00%

-34.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.07%

0.00%

+29.07%

Volatility

BTCC.TO vs. MNY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) at 0.03%. This indicates that BTCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCC.TOMNY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.89%

0.03%

+9.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.00%

0.12%

+33.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.32%

0.16%

+43.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.47%

0.37%

+55.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.81%

0.37%

+56.44%

BTCC.TO vs. MNY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MNY.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCC.TO vs. MNY.TO - Dividend Comparison

BTCC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BTCC.TO
Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund
2.56%2.93%4.71%4.85%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCC.TO and MNY.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MNY.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MNY.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTCC.TO.

BTCC.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MNY.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTCC.TO and 0.22% for MNY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCC.TO and MNY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer