PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCC-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTCC-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BTCC-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BTCC-B.TO
Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units
-21.35%-11.83%136.57%148.15%-1.52%
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
-10.15%9.09%48.13%96.20%-1.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC-B.TO achieves a -21.35% return, which is significantly lower than YAMZ.NEO's -10.15% return.


BTCC-B.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
0.15%
YTD
-21.35%
6M
-42.60%
1Y
-23.22%
3Y*
33.05%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*

YAMZ.NEO

1D
5.33%
1M
1.54%
YTD
-10.15%
6M
-2.65%
1Y
13.81%
3Y*
31.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTCC-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC-B.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than YAMZ.NEO's 1.72% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BTCC-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC-B.TO
BTCC-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BTCC-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

YAMZ.NEO
YAMZ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCC-B.TOYAMZ.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.53

0.37

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.52

0.77

-1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.10

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

0.69

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.89

1.69

-2.58

BTCC-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC-B.TO and YAMZ.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCC-B.TOYAMZ.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

0.37

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

1.08

-0.99

Correlation

The correlation between BTCC-B.TO and YAMZ.NEO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BTCC-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Dividend Comparison

BTCC-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YAMZ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.63%.


TTM2025202420232022
BTCC-B.TO
Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
16.63%14.12%8.07%7.89%1.02%

Drawdowns

BTCC-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.12%, which is greater than YAMZ.NEO's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC-B.TO and YAMZ.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCC-B.TOYAMZ.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.12%

-34.37%

-40.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.47%

-21.79%

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.27%

-16.05%

-30.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-7.38%

-25.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.85%

8.92%

+14.93%

Volatility

BTCC-B.TO vs. YAMZ.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.52% compared to Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) at 11.57%. This indicates that BTCC-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YAMZ.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BTCC-B.TOYAMZ.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.52%

11.57%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.11%

24.93%

+11.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.39%

37.22%

+7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.31%

34.46%

+20.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.52%

34.46%

+21.06%