BTCC-B.TO vs. SBT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO).
BTCC-B.TO and SBT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTCC-B.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 14, 2021. SBT.TO is a passively managed fund by Purpose Investments that tracks the performance of the N/A (Physical Bullion). It was launched on May 25, 2016.
Performance
BTCC-B.TO vs. SBT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BTCC-B.TO vs. SBT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCC-B.TO Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units | -21.35% | -11.83% | 136.57% | 148.15% | -62.24% | -14.97% |
SBT.TO Purpose Silver Bullion Fund | 6.27% | 137.07% | 18.55% | -0.86% | 1.99% | -15.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCC-B.TO achieves a -21.35% return, which is significantly lower than SBT.TO's 6.27% return.
BTCC-B.TO
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -21.35%
- 6M
- -42.60%
- 1Y
- -23.22%
- 3Y*
- 33.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- —
SBT.TO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -15.95%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 6M
- 57.83%
- 1Y
- 116.22%
- 3Y*
- 43.45%
- 5Y*
- 23.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BTCC-B.TO vs. SBT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCC-B.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SBT.TO's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BTCC-B.TO vs. SBT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BTCC-B.TO
SBT.TO
BTCC-B.TO vs. SBT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCC-B.TO | SBT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | 2.05 | -2.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | 2.18 | -2.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.39 | -0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 2.66 | -3.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 8.23 | -9.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCC-B.TO | SBT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | 2.05 | -2.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.66 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.22 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCC-B.TO and SBT.TO is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BTCC-B.TO vs. SBT.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTCC-B.TO nor SBT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BTCC-B.TO vs. SBT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCC-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.12%, which is greater than SBT.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC-B.TO and SBT.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCC-B.TO | SBT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.12% | -47.82% | -27.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.47% | -42.69% | -7.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.12% | -42.69% | -32.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.27% | -35.00% | -11.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -16.61% | -15.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.85% | 13.79% | +10.06% |
Volatility
BTCC-B.TO vs. SBT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) is 12.52%, while Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) has a volatility of 17.45%. This indicates that BTCC-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BTCC-B.TO | SBT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.52% | 17.45% | -4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.11% | 57.11% | -21.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.39% | 57.02% | -12.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.31% | 35.62% | +19.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.52% | 66.77% | -11.25% |