BTC vs. CBOL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Grayscale, while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.

Performance

BTC vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTC achieves a -31.66% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -2.28% return.

BTC

• 1D: -3.96%
• 1M: -21.06%
• YTD: -31.66%
• 6M: -31.44%
• 1Y: -43.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBOL

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: -2.28%
• 6M: -2.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTC vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF	-31.66%	-24.53%
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF	-2.28%	-2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BTC and CBOL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

BTC vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTC

BTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CBOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTC vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTC	CBOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	—	—

Drawdowns

BTC vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTC drawdown since its inception was -52.37%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -5.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTC and CBOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTC	CBOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.37%	-5.05%	-47.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.37%	-4.89%	-47.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.73%	-3.31%	-14.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.70%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTC	CBOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.21%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.39%	3.82%	+40.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.29%	3.82%	+44.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.29%	3.82%	+44.47%

BTC vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTC vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison

BTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.

Position	TTM	2025
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF	1.83%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTC and CBOL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, BTC and CBOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BTC or CBOL?

On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTC or CBOL?

BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBOL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTC or CBOL?

CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for BTC.

What is the main difference between BTC and CBOL?

BTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BTC and 0.79% for CBOL.