PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BT-A.L vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BT-A.L vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BT Group plc (BT-A.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BT-A.L is traded in GBp, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BT-A.L achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BT-A.L has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of -1.67%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.03% annualized return.


BT-A.L

1D
1.65%
1M
-7.51%
YTD
13.83%
6M
17.66%
1Y
18.58%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
-1.67%

MSFT

1D
0.19%
1M
-7.76%
YTD
-18.43%
6M
-18.19%
1Y
-16.04%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
25.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BT-A.L vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
13.83%33.10%23.69%17.70%-30.23%29.97%-31.28%-12.15%-6.56%-21.99%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.43%7.35%14.90%50.28%-19.47%53.92%38.35%51.56%27.96%28.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BT-A.L and MSFT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2007

0.13

The correlation between BT-A.L and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

BT-A.L:

£20.36B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BT-A.L:

£9.54B

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

BT-A.L:

£7.36B

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BT-A.L vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BT-A.L
BT-A.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BT-A.L vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BT Group plc (BT-A.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BT-A.LMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.90

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

-0.48

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

-0.94

+2.64

BT-A.L vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BT-A.L and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BT-A.L vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BT-A.L drawdown since its inception was -75.45%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -40.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BT-A.L and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BT-A.LMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.45%

-40.05%

-35.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.61%

-34.18%

+14.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

-34.18%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.18%

-34.18%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.80%

-34.18%

-37.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.44%

-28.53%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-8.84%

-28.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.36%

17.53%

-7.17%

Volatility

BT-A.L vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BT Group plc (BT-A.L) is 9.89%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that BT-A.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BT-A.LMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.89%

10.61%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.93%

21.91%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.53%

25.64%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.74%

25.92%

+3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.01%

27.30%

+3.71%

Dividends

BT-A.L vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

BT-A.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than MSFT's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
3.92%4.46%5.62%6.23%6.87%1.36%0.00%8.00%6.37%5.67%3.94%2.73%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

BT-A.L vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BT Group plc and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
5.12B
82.89B
(BT-A.L) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BT-A.L values in GBP, MSFT values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BT-A.L and MSFT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BT-A.L and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer