BSMW vs. MEAR
BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) and MEAR (iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. BSMW is passively managed, while MEAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSMW returned 3.20%/yr vs 3.58%/yr for MEAR. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMW charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MEAR.
Performance
BSMW vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMW achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than MEAR's 1.06% return.
BSMW
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEAR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
BSMW vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.30% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 7.00% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 1.06% | 3.76% | 3.40% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMW and MEAR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMW vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank
BSMW
MEAR
BSMW vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMW | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.91 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 7.07 | -4.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.53 | 28.99 | -21.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMW | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 3.86 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.11 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
BSMW vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMW drawdown since its inception was -7.57%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMW and MEAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMW | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -2.68% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -0.47% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.34% | -0.86% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | 0.00% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -0.19% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.11% | +0.81% |
Volatility
BSMW vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) at 0.24%. This indicates that BSMW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMW | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 0.24% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.98% | 0.61% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82% | 0.86% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 0.98% | +4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 1.52% | +3.48% |
BSMW vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMW has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSMW vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison
BSMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than MEAR's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 2.84% | 2.95% | 3.44% | 3.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMW and MEAR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSMW has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to MEAR (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMW dropped -7.57% vs MEAR's -2.68%.
On 3-year performance, MEAR leads with 3.58% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, MEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MEAR has performed better with a 3.58% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MEAR.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 2.84% for MEAR.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMW and 0.25% for MEAR.
MEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSMW and MEAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer