PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMQ vs. LMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMQ vs. LMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) and iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMQ achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than LMUB's 2.42% return.


BSMQ

1D
0.07%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.18%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*

LMUB

1D
0.10%
1M
0.96%
YTD
2.42%
6M
3.09%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMQ vs. LMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSMQ and LMUB is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMQ vs. LMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMQ
BSMQ Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BSMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

LMUB
LMUB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMQ vs. LMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) and iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMQLMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.12

3.02

+6.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.88

10.59

+13.29

BSMQ vs. LMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the LMUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMQ and LMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMQLMUBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.23

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.83

-0.59

Drawdowns

BSMQ vs. LMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMQ drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, which is greater than LMUB's maximum drawdown of -5.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMQ and LMUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMQLMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.18%

-5.51%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.33%

-3.11%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-1.60%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

0.89%

-0.77%

Volatility

BSMQ vs. LMUB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) is 0.40%, while iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that BSMQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMQLMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

1.44%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.94%

3.04%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

4.21%

-2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.68%

5.96%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.79%

5.96%

-1.17%

BSMQ vs. LMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than LMUB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMQ vs. LMUB - Dividend Comparison

BSMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than LMUB's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSMQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF
2.76%2.74%2.75%2.47%1.60%1.14%1.57%0.44%
LMUB
iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF
3.77%3.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMQ and LMUB have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMUB has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to BSMQ (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMQ dropped -13.18% vs LMUB's -5.51%.

On 1-year performance, LMUB leads with 9.36% vs 2.98% for BSMQ. On fees, LMUB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BSMQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LMUB has performed better with a 9.36% return vs 2.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LMUB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMQ.

LMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 2.76% for BSMQ.

BSMQ tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2026 Index, while LMUB tracks ICE AMT-Free US Long National Municipal Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMQ and 0.09% for LMUB.

BSMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMQ and LMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer