BSMIX vs. SSLCX
BSMIX (iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund) and SSLCX (DWS Small Cap Core Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BSMIX returned 11.38%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for SSLCX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BSMIX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SSLCX.
Performance
BSMIX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMIX achieves a 19.88% return, which is significantly higher than SSLCX's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, BSMIX has outperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.
BSMIX
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 1Y
- 33.27%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.87%
SSLCX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 1Y
- 14.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BSMIX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMIX iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund | 19.88% | 11.92% | 12.04% | 17.15% | -18.39% | 18.00% | 20.28% | 27.62% | -10.22% | 16.75% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 10.96% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMIX and SSLCX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.91 |
The correlation between BSMIX and SSLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMIX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
BSMIX
SSLCX
BSMIX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSMIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.15 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 1.41 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 4.16 | +7.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSMIX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMIX drawdown since its inception was -41.32%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMIX and SSLCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.32% | -63.14% | +21.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -8.78% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.49% | -17.34% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -22.57% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.32% | -48.07% | +6.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -6.08% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -11.25% | +3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.99% | -0.50% |
Volatility
BSMIX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) is 3.46%, while DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that BSMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 3.81% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | 10.83% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 15.06% | +2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 17.18% | +4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 20.97% | +0.72% |
BSMIX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMIX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
BSMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than SSLCX's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMIX iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund | 2.47% | 2.90% | 2.04% | 1.37% | 4.94% | 4.77% | 4.42% | 2.83% | 4.33% | 2.83% | 1.45% | 0.00% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.09% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMIX and SSLCX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSLCX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to BSMIX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMIX dropped -41.32% vs SSLCX's -63.14%.
BSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSMIX and SSLCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer