PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMIX vs. FSSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMIX vs. FSSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BSMIX having a 19.88% return and FSSNX slightly lower at 19.50%. Over the past 10 years, BSMIX has outperformed FSSNX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while FSSNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.75% annualized return.


BSMIX

1D
1.02%
1M
-1.45%
6M
14.20%
YTD
19.88%
1Y
33.27%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
11.38%
ALL TIME*
11.87%

FSSNX

1D
1.37%
1M
-1.63%
6M
13.42%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
37.75%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
10.75%
ALL TIME*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BSMIX vs. FSSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSMIX
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund
19.88%11.92%12.04%17.15%-18.39%18.00%20.28%27.62%-10.22%16.75%
FSSNX
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund
19.50%12.94%11.71%17.11%-20.28%14.70%19.99%25.70%-11.24%14.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMIX and FSSNX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.98

The correlation between BSMIX and FSSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMIX vs. FSSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSMIX
BSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FSSNX
FSSNX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FSSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSMIX vs. FSSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSMIXFSSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.08

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.07

10.93

+1.13

BSMIX vs. FSSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the FSSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMIX and FSSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSMIX vs. FSSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMIX drawdown since its inception was -41.32%, roughly equal to the maximum FSSNX drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMIX and FSSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMIXFSSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.32%

-41.72%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-11.00%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-27.45%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

-31.87%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.32%

-41.72%

+0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-2.53%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-8.22%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

3.10%

-0.61%

Volatility

BSMIX vs. FSSNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) is 3.46%, while Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that BSMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMIXFSSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.81%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

14.14%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

19.42%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

22.55%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

23.42%

-1.73%

BSMIX vs. FSSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSNX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMIX vs. FSSNX - Dividend Comparison

BSMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than FSSNX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMIX
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund
2.47%2.90%2.04%1.37%4.94%4.77%4.42%2.83%4.33%2.83%1.45%0.00%
FSSNX
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund
1.05%1.08%1.04%1.43%1.26%3.92%0.94%2.96%4.94%3.37%2.27%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BSMIX and FSSNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSSNX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to BSMIX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMIX dropped -41.32% vs FSSNX's -41.72%.

FSSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMIX and FSSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer