BSL vs. CPMPX
BSL (Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund) and CPMPX (Changing Parameters Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, BSL returned 5.87%/yr vs 4.17%/yr for CPMPX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSL charges 1.50%/yr vs 2.90%/yr for CPMPX.
Performance
BSL vs. CPMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSL achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than CPMPX's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, BSL has outperformed CPMPX with an annualized return of 5.87%, while CPMPX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.17% annualized return.
BSL
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- -0.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 5.87%
CPMPX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.17%
BSL vs. CPMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund | -0.89% | 2.15% | 18.16% | 20.03% | -22.88% | 28.33% | -4.44% | 14.06% | -7.52% | 5.74% |
CPMPX Changing Parameters Fund | 0.85% | 6.65% | -3.47% | 8.13% | -0.22% | 3.86% | 13.43% | 6.82% | -1.19% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSL and CPMPX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2010 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSL vs. CPMPX — Risk / Return Rank
BSL
CPMPX
BSL vs. CPMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) and Changing Parameters Fund (CPMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSL | CPMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.66 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 4.01 | -4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 11.13 | -11.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSL vs. CPMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSL drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, which is greater than CPMPX's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSL and CPMPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSL | CPMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.83% | -8.87% | -34.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -1.31% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.86% | -8.13% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.48% | -8.13% | -16.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | -8.13% | -35.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -1.09% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -1.86% | -5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 0.47% | +2.88% |
Volatility
BSL vs. CPMPX - Volatility Comparison
Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Changing Parameters Fund (CPMPX) at 0.62%. This indicates that BSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSL | CPMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 0.62% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.24% | 1.36% | +3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.62% | 1.86% | +4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.49% | 3.84% | +6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 3.12% | +13.28% |
BSL vs. CPMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CPMPX's 2.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSL vs. CPMPX - Dividend Comparison
BSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, more than CPMPX's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSL Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund | 8.35% | 8.45% | 9.46% | 10.76% | 6.89% | 5.75% | 7.65% | 8.15% | 9.21% | 5.93% | 5.86% | 7.27% |
CPMPX Changing Parameters Fund | 3.80% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 4.26% | 5.03% | 4.24% | 6.94% | 2.85% | 1.71% | 3.32% | 2.25% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSL and CPMPX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSL has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to CPMPX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSL dropped -43.83% vs CPMPX's -8.87%.
CPMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSL and CPMPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer