BSJV vs. PSH
BSJV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and PSH (PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. BSJV is passively managed, while PSH is actively managed. Over the past year, BSJV returned 6.50% vs 6.25% for PSH. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PSH.
Performance
BSJV vs. PSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJV achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than PSH's 2.02% return.
BSJV
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSH
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJV vs. PSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJV Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.11% | 9.50% | 5.66% | 0.35% |
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF | 2.02% | 7.34% | 7.96% | 0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJV and PSH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between BSJV and PSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSJV vs. PSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSJV
PSH
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSJV
PSH
-
Industrials
BSJV
PSH
-
Energy
BSJV
PSH
Healthcare
BSJV
PSH
-
Financial Services
BSJV
PSH
Basic Materials
BSJV
PSH
-
Real Estate
BSJV
PSH
-
Communication Services
BSJV
PSH
-
Technology
BSJV
PSH
-
Utilities
BSJV
PSH
-
Consumer Defensive
BSJV
PSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJV vs. PSH — Risk / Return Rank
BSJV
PSH
BSJV vs. PSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJV | PSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 4.43 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 13.10 | -4.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJV | PSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.08 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 2.23 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
BSJV vs. PSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJV drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, which is greater than PSH's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJV and PSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJV | PSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -3.06% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -1.42% | -1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.02% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -0.26% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 0.48% | +0.27% |
Volatility
BSJV vs. PSH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) at 0.70%. This indicates that BSJV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJV | PSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 0.70% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.32% | 2.10% | +1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 3.01% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 3.26% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 3.26% | +2.90% |
BSJV vs. PSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PSH's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJV vs. PSH - Dividend Comparison
BSJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, less than PSH's 6.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJV Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.58% | 6.52% | 6.67% | 1.62% |
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF | 6.66% | 6.62% | 8.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJV and PSH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSJV has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to PSH (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJV dropped -5.22% vs PSH's -3.06%.
On 1-year performance, BSJV leads with 6.50% vs 6.25% for PSH. On fees, BSJV is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, PSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BSJV has performed better with a 6.50% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSJV is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PSH.
PSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 6.58% for BSJV.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJV and 0.45% for PSH.
PSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJV and PSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer