BSJQ vs. IBHG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSJQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF) and IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BSJQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index while IBHG tracks the Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSJQ returned 6.94%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for IBHG. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSJQ charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHG.

Performance

BSJQ vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJQ achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than IBHG's 0.96% return.

BSJQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 4.62%
• 3Y*: 6.94%
• 5Y*: 3.74%
• 10Y*: —

IBHG

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 1.46%
• 1Y: 4.61%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJQ vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF	0.85%	6.59%	7.49%	9.83%	-7.35%	1.32%
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF	0.96%	6.90%	7.42%	11.27%	-8.88%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJQ and IBHG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between BSJQ and IBHG has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BSJQ vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJQ

BSJQ Risk / Return Rank: 95
BSJQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BSJQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BSJQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BSJQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
BSJQ Martin Ratio Rank: 97

IBHG

IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 79
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJQ vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSJQ	IBHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	2.20	+1.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.25	3.42	+1.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.42	+0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.57	6.38	+2.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	41.55	23.30	+18.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSJQ vs. IBHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the IBHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJQ and IBHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSJQ	IBHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.35	2.20	+1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.56	-0.03

Drawdowns

BSJQ vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJQ drawdown since its inception was -24.13%, which is greater than IBHG's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJQ and IBHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJQ	IBHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.13%	-13.85%	-10.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.54%	-0.73%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.66%	-3.39%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.22%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-2.67%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.11%	0.20%	-0.09%

Volatility

BSJQ vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) is 0.54%, while iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) has a volatility of 0.58%. This indicates that BSJQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSJQ	IBHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.54%	0.58%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.98%	1.53%	-0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38%	2.11%	-0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.73%	6.37%	-0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.45%	6.37%	+2.08%

BSJQ vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJQ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJQ vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison

BSJQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than IBHG's 6.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF	5.83%	6.10%	6.58%	6.58%	5.58%	4.27%	4.64%	4.59%	2.39%
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF	6.08%	6.33%	7.02%	6.66%	5.62%	2.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSJQ and IBHG in my portfolio?

BSJQ and IBHG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSJQ or IBHG?

IBHG has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to BSJQ (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJQ dropped -24.13% vs IBHG's -13.85%.

Which ETF is better, BSJQ or IBHG?

On 3-year performance, IBHG leads with 7.37% vs 6.94% for BSJQ. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSJQ or IBHG?

Over the 3-year period, IBHG has performed better with a 7.37% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJQ or IBHG?

IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJQ or IBHG?

IBHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 5.83% for BSJQ.

What is the main difference between BSJQ and IBHG?

BSJQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index, while IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJQ and 0.35% for IBHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.