BSEP vs. PAPR
BSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) and PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BSEP tracks the S&P 500 Index while PAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSEP returned 10.62%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for PAPR. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BSEP vs. PAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSEP achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than PAPR's 7.18% return.
BSEP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 14.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
BSEP vs. PAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 6.02% | 14.80% | 16.96% | 20.94% | -9.20% | 14.64% | 12.44% | 6.84% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.18% | 6.58% | 12.28% | 16.45% | -4.29% | 7.51% | 4.62% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSEP and PAPR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BSEP and PAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSEP vs. PAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSEP
PAPR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BSEP
PAPR
Financial Services
BSEP
PAPR
Communication Services
BSEP
PAPR
Consumer Cyclical
BSEP
PAPR
Healthcare
BSEP
PAPR
Industrials
BSEP
PAPR
Consumer Defensive
BSEP
PAPR
Energy
BSEP
PAPR
Utilities
BSEP
PAPR
Real Estate
BSEP
PAPR
Basic Materials
BSEP
PAPR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSEP vs. PAPR — Risk / Return Rank
BSEP
PAPR
BSEP vs. PAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSEP | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 2.03 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 17.02 | -13.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.41 | 73.26 | -56.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSEP | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 4.24 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 1.01 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.83 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
BSEP vs. PAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSEP drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, which is greater than PAPR's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSEP and PAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSEP | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | -15.31% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -0.83% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.36% | -11.87% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | -11.87% | -3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.71% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -1.57% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 0.19% | +0.95% |
Volatility
BSEP vs. PAPR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) at 1.05%. This indicates that BSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSEP | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 1.05% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.89% | 2.55% | +3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.81% | 3.34% | +4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 8.21% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 9.44% | +4.32% |
BSEP vs. PAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSEP and PAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BSEP vs. PAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSEP nor PAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.39% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSEP and PAPR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSEP has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to PAPR (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSEP dropped -23.98% vs PAPR's -15.31%.
On 5-year performance, BSEP leads with 10.62% vs 8.23% for PAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSEP has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSEP and PAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BSEP and PAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BSEP tracks S&P 500 Index, while PAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index.
PAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSEP and PAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer