BSCU vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSCU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCU is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. BSCU charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

BSCU vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BSCU

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 0.52%
• 1Y: 5.00%
• 3Y*: 5.53%
• 5Y*: 0.84%
• 10Y*: —

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCU vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF	-0.14%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

BSCU vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSCU	QCON
Healthcare	14.1%	-
Financial Services	12.6%	7.9%
Technology	10.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	-
Energy	8.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	-
Industrials	6.4%	1.0%
Utilities	4.1%	1.5%
Real Estate	3.7%	-
Communication Services	3.7%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

BSCU vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCU

BSCU Risk / Return Rank: 50
BSCU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BSCU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BSCU Omega Ratio Rank: 48
BSCU Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BSCU Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCU vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSCU	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.29	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCU	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	—	—

Drawdowns

BSCU vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCU drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCU and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCU	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.34%	0.00%	-22.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	0.00%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.04%	0.00%	-8.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSCU	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97%	0.00%	+2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.62%	0.00%	+6.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.47%	0.00%	+6.47%

BSCU vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSCU vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

BSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF	4.62%	4.56%	4.70%	4.07%	3.06%	1.93%	0.33%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BSCU or QCON?

On fees, BSCU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCU or QCON?

BSCU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCU or QCON?

BSCU has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between BSCU and QCON?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCU and 0.32% for QCON.