PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCU vs. OVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCU vs. OVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCU achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than OVT's 2.61% return.


BSCU

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.52%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5.53%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*

OVT

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.55%
YTD
2.61%
6M
3.07%
1Y
8.92%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCU vs. OVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSCU
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF
0.32%8.24%3.12%8.66%-15.08%-1.82%
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
2.61%7.61%7.44%7.73%-9.68%2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCU and OVT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2021

0.62

The correlation between BSCU and OVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSCU vs. OVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCU
OVT

Healthcare

14.1%
8.5%

Financial Services

12.6%
11.8%

Technology

10.4%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
10.1%

Energy

8.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
4.9%

Industrials

6.4%
8.3%

Utilities

4.1%
2.4%

Real Estate

3.7%
1.9%

Communication Services

3.7%
11.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Healthcare

BSCU
14.1%
OVT
8.5%

Financial Services

BSCU
12.6%
OVT
11.8%

Technology

BSCU
10.4%
OVT
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BSCU
9.7%
OVT
10.1%

Energy

BSCU
8.0%
OVT
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

BSCU
6.5%
OVT
4.9%

Industrials

BSCU
6.4%
OVT
8.3%

Utilities

BSCU
4.1%
OVT
2.4%

Real Estate

BSCU
3.7%
OVT
1.9%

Communication Services

BSCU
3.7%
OVT
11.2%

Basic Materials

BSCU
1.8%
OVT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCU vs. OVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCU
BSCU Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BSCU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCU Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCU Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

OVT
OVT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
OVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
OVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCU vs. OVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCUOVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.51

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

5.78

-3.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.29

20.00

-11.71

BSCU vs. OVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCU Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the OVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCU and OVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCUOVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.60

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.65

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.69

-0.62

Drawdowns

BSCU vs. OVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCU drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, which is greater than OVT's maximum drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCU and OVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCUOVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.34%

-13.59%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.07%

-1.55%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.66%

-3.55%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.74%

-13.59%

-8.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.41%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-3.39%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.45%

+0.15%

Volatility

BSCU vs. OVT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) have volatilities of 0.85% and 0.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCUOVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

0.83%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

2.52%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97%

3.44%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

4.63%

+1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.47%

4.54%

+1.93%

BSCU vs. OVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than OVT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCU vs. OVT - Dividend Comparison

BSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than OVT's 8.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BSCU
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF
4.62%4.56%4.70%4.07%3.06%1.93%0.33%
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
8.17%7.21%6.15%5.11%4.12%4.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCU and OVT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCU has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to OVT (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCU dropped -22.34% vs OVT's -13.59%.

On 5-year performance, OVT leads with 3.01% vs 0.84% for BSCU. On fees, BSCU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OVT has performed better with a 3.01% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.

OVT has the higher dividend yield at 8.17%, compared with 4.62% for BSCU.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCU and 0.80% for OVT.

OVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCU and OVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer