PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCQ vs. QCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCQ vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSCQ

1D
0.08%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.92%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
5.06%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*

QCON

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCQ vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


BSCQ vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCQ
QCON

Financial Services

32.7%
7.9%

Technology

10.8%

-

Healthcare

7.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%

-

Industrials

6.0%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%

-

Utilities

3.5%
1.5%

Energy

3.0%

-

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Communication Services

1.5%

-

Basic Materials

0.5%

-

Financial Services

BSCQ
32.7%
QCON
7.9%

Technology

BSCQ
10.8%
QCON

-

Healthcare

BSCQ
7.4%
QCON

-

Consumer Cyclical

BSCQ
6.1%
QCON

-

Industrials

BSCQ
6.0%
QCON
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

BSCQ
3.9%
QCON

-

Utilities

BSCQ
3.5%
QCON
1.5%

Energy

BSCQ
3.0%
QCON

-

Real Estate

BSCQ
2.9%
QCON

-

Communication Services

BSCQ
1.5%
QCON

-

Basic Materials

BSCQ
0.5%
QCON

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCQ vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCQ
BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

QCON
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCQ vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCQQCONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

43.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

179.65

BSCQ vs. QCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCQQCONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

Drawdowns

BSCQ vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCQ drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCQ and QCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCQQCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

0.00%

-16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

0.00%

-2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

Volatility

BSCQ vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCQQCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

0.00%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.30%

0.00%

+3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.77%

0.00%

+4.77%

BSCQ vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCQ vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
4.12%4.14%4.05%3.53%2.54%1.91%2.42%2.96%3.32%2.92%0.51%
QCON
American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCQ and 0.32% for QCON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCQ and QCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer