BSCQ vs. QCON
BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCQ is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. BSCQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
BSCQ vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.17% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
BSCQ vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCQ
QCON
Financial Services
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
BSCQ
QCON
Technology
BSCQ
QCON
-
Healthcare
BSCQ
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSCQ
QCON
-
Industrials
BSCQ
QCON
Consumer Defensive
BSCQ
QCON
-
Utilities
BSCQ
QCON
Energy
BSCQ
QCON
-
Real Estate
BSCQ
QCON
-
Communication Services
BSCQ
QCON
-
Basic Materials
BSCQ
QCON
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCQ vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
BSCQ
QCON
BSCQ vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCQ | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 43.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 179.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCQ | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BSCQ vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCQ drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCQ and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCQ | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | 0.00% | -16.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | 0.00% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | — | — |
Volatility
BSCQ vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCQ | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 0.00% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.30% | 0.00% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 0.00% | +4.77% |
BSCQ vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCQ vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCQ and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for BSCQ and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer