BSCP vs. IBHF
BSCP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF) and IBHF (iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCP is passively managed, while IBHF is actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHF.
Performance
BSCP vs. IBHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSCP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 7.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCP vs. IBHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 4.19% | 5.06% | 5.11% | -5.99% | -1.37% | 1.38% |
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 0.63% | 6.60% | 8.55% | 10.40% | -6.66% | 4.43% | 2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCP and IBHF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2020 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BSCP and IBHF has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCP vs. IBHF — Risk / Return Rank
BSCP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBHF
BSCP vs. IBHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSCP | IBHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSCP vs. IBHF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCP | IBHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.36% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.78% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility
BSCP vs. IBHF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCP | IBHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 5.79% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 5.63% | — |
BSCP vs. IBHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IBHF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCP vs. IBHF - Dividend Comparison
BSCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than IBHF's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.92% | 3.99% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.42% | 3.12% | 3.26% | 2.93% | 2.94% | 0.75% |
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.53% | 6.73% | 7.17% | 7.33% | 6.01% | 4.55% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCP and IBHF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHF.
IBHF has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 1.92% for BSCP.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCP and 0.35% for IBHF.
Find the right allocation for BSCP and IBHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer