BSCMX vs. NSDVX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX).

BSCMX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 2, 2018. NSDVX is managed by North Star. It was launched on May 31, 2013.

Performance

BSCMX vs. NSDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BSCMX vs. NSDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund	6.39%	23.51%	24.77%	22.75%	-7.89%	27.61%	20.38%	12.82%	-12.23%
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund	7.11%	-1.31%	9.25%	8.06%	-6.36%	16.16%	6.51%	16.13%	-14.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCMX achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than NSDVX's 7.11% return.

BSCMX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -8.34%
• YTD: 6.39%
• 6M: 12.73%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: 22.70%
• 5Y*: 15.23%
• 10Y*: —

NSDVX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: 7.11%
• 6M: 3.08%
• 1Y: 9.25%
• 3Y*: 7.90%
• 5Y*: 3.33%
• 10Y*: 6.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCMX vs. NSDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCMX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than NSDVX's 1.37% expense ratio.

NSDVX

North Star Dividend Fund

BSCMX

Brandes Small Cap Value Fund

Return for Risk

BSCMX vs. NSDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCMX

BSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 90
BSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

NSDVX

NSDVX Risk / Return Rank: 22
NSDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
NSDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NSDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
NSDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
NSDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCMX vs. NSDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSCMX	NSDVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	0.55	+1.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	0.91	+1.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.11	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	0.80	+1.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.11	1.95	+9.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSCMX vs. NSDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the NSDVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCMX and NSDVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCMX	NSDVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.83	0.55	+1.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	0.21	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.44	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between BSCMX and NSDVX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BSCMX vs. NSDVX - Dividend Comparison

BSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than NSDVX's 3.09% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund	4.27%	4.54%	2.31%	3.50%	2.93%	4.38%	1.76%	1.11%	9.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NSDVX North Star Dividend Fund	3.09%	3.45%	7.00%	2.52%	6.57%	3.31%	1.52%	2.64%	6.87%	2.48%	4.67%	3.51%

Drawdowns

BSCMX vs. NSDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCMX drawdown since its inception was -38.12%, roughly equal to the maximum NSDVX drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCMX and NSDVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCMX	NSDVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.12%	-38.64%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.85%	-10.48%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.34%	-22.58%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.97%	-5.32%	-3.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.10%	-6.62%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	4.32%	-1.00%

Volatility

BSCMX vs. NSDVX - Volatility Comparison

Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to North Star Dividend Fund (NSDVX) at 4.16%. This indicates that BSCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSCMX	NSDVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.43%	4.16%	+1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.27%	10.16%	+2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.02%	17.10%	+4.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.84%	16.16%	+1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.69%	17.66%	+3.03%