BSBAX vs. SWSBX
BSBAX (Northern Short Bond Fund) and SWSBX (Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, BSBAX returned 1.52%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for SWSBX. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BSBAX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SWSBX.
Performance
BSBAX vs. SWSBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSBAX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than SWSBX's 0.16% return.
BSBAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 2.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.11%
SWSBX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 2.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BSBAX vs. SWSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSBAX Northern Short Bond Fund | 0.60% | 4.46% | 4.07% | 4.52% | -4.89% | -0.44% | 3.73% | 5.19% | 0.73% | 1.22% |
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 0.16% | 6.06% | 3.42% | 3.95% | -5.89% | -1.28% | 4.47% | 4.96% | 1.34% | 0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSBAX and SWSBX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2017 | 0.74 |
The correlation between BSBAX and SWSBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSBAX vs. SWSBX — Risk / Return Rank
BSBAX
SWSBX
BSBAX vs. SWSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Short Bond Fund (BSBAX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSBAX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.20 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 1.37 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 3.86 | +4.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSBAX vs. SWSBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSBAX drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, smaller than the maximum SWSBX drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSBAX and SWSBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSBAX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -9.06% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -1.54% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.20% | -1.79% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.31% | -8.88% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.81% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -1.78% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 0.55% | -0.16% |
Volatility
BSBAX vs. SWSBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northern Short Bond Fund (BSBAX) is 0.43%, while Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) has a volatility of 0.50%. This indicates that BSBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSBAX | SWSBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | 0.50% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.20% | 1.67% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67% | 2.12% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 3.00% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.80% | 2.46% | -0.66% |
BSBAX vs. SWSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSBAX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSBX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSBAX vs. SWSBX - Dividend Comparison
BSBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than SWSBX's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSBAX Northern Short Bond Fund | 3.69% | 3.20% | 3.54% | 2.49% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 2.00% | 2.62% | 2.57% | 1.85% | 1.43% | 1.25% |
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 3.80% | 4.09% | 3.66% | 2.36% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 1.82% | 2.41% | 2.12% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSBAX and SWSBX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWSBX has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to BSBAX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSBAX dropped -7.31% vs SWSBX's -9.06%.
BSBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSBAX and SWSBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer