PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSBAX vs. DLSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSBAX vs. DLSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Short Bond Fund (BSBAX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSBAX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than DLSNX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, BSBAX has underperformed DLSNX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while DLSNX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.59% annualized return.


BSBAX

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.52%
1Y
3.00%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
1.91%

DLSNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.25%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
2.96%
10Y*
2.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSBAX vs. DLSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSBAX
Northern Short Bond Fund
0.46%4.46%4.07%4.52%-4.89%-0.44%3.73%5.19%0.73%1.59%
DLSNX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N
1.17%5.49%5.06%6.50%-3.04%0.56%1.76%4.47%1.15%2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BSBAX and DLSNX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011

0.54

The correlation between BSBAX and DLSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSBAX vs. DLSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSBAX
BSBAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BSBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BSBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DLSNX
DLSNX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DLSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DLSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSBAX vs. DLSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Short Bond Fund (BSBAX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSBAXDLSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.88

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

5.31

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

24.97

-16.36

BSBAX vs. DLSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the DLSNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSBAX and DLSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSBAX vs. DLSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSBAX drawdown since its inception was -7.31%, roughly equal to the maximum DLSNX drawdown of -7.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSBAX and DLSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSBAXDLSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-7.46%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-0.72%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.20%

-0.72%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.31%

-4.91%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.31%

-7.46%

+0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.00%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-0.41%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.15%

+0.21%

Volatility

BSBAX vs. DLSNX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Short Bond Fund (BSBAX) has a higher volatility of 0.45% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) at 0.38%. This indicates that BSBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSBAXDLSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

0.38%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.22%

0.89%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68%

1.18%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.13%

1.42%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.80%

1.57%

+0.23%

BSBAX vs. DLSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSBAX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DLSNX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSBAX vs. DLSNX - Dividend Comparison

BSBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than DLSNX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSBAX
Northern Short Bond Fund
3.69%3.20%3.54%2.49%0.94%1.20%2.00%2.62%2.57%1.85%1.43%1.25%
DLSNX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N
4.29%4.40%4.85%4.25%2.24%1.47%2.12%2.96%2.67%2.18%2.27%2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSBAX and DLSNX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSBAX has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to DLSNX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSBAX dropped -7.31% vs DLSNX's -7.46%.

DLSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSBAX and DLSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer