PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRZU vs. ACLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRZU vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRZU achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.21% return.


BRZU

1D
-6.46%
1M
-22.26%
YTD
11.76%
6M
2.36%
1Y
55.66%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
-4.04%
10Y*
-16.20%

ACLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.58%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRZU vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
11.76%97.99%-27.96%
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
2.21%5.32%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BRZU and ACLO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRZU vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRZU
BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLO
ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRZU vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRZUACLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-13.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

3.41

-2.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

19.90

-18.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.24

164.37

-159.14

BRZU vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRZU and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRZUACLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

7.29

-6.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

5.10

-5.45

Drawdowns

BRZU vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRZU drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRZU and ACLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRZUACLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-1.01%

-98.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.39%

-0.27%

-32.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.20%

0.00%

-99.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.55%

-0.05%

-89.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.66%

0.03%

+10.63%

Volatility

BRZU vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) has a higher volatility of 15.75% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that BRZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRZUACLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.75%

0.14%

+15.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.66%

0.57%

+41.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.58%

0.73%

+48.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.40%

1.08%

+54.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.15%

1.08%

+82.07%

BRZU vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRZU has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRZU vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

BRZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than ACLO's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
4.91%4.87%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
2.39%2.39%8.73%3.24%4.70%6.29%0.78%0.95%1.04%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRZU and ACLO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRZU has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRZU dropped -99.71% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

On 1-year performance, BRZU leads with 55.66% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BRZU has performed better with a 55.66% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 2.39% for BRZU.

BRZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and TCW. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BRZU and 0.20% for ACLO.

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRZU and ACLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer