PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRWJX vs. FSSKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRWJX vs. FSSKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund (BRWJX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRWJX achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than FSSKX's 13.18% return. Over the past 10 years, BRWJX has outperformed FSSKX with an annualized return of 16.99%, while FSSKX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.58% annualized return.


BRWJX

1D
-1.48%
1M
-2.68%
YTD
4.06%
6M
2.57%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
23.24%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
16.99%

FSSKX

1D
-1.68%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
13.18%
6M
11.97%
1Y
30.66%
3Y*
21.65%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRWJX vs. FSSKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRWJX
MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund
4.06%16.90%35.62%41.06%-29.75%28.77%30.81%32.37%-4.78%26.36%
FSSKX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K
13.18%18.98%19.89%27.04%-19.47%23.28%25.01%32.33%-8.52%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BRWJX and FSSKX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2015

0.93

The correlation between BRWJX and FSSKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRWJX vs. FSSKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRWJX
BRWJX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BRWJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRWJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRWJX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BRWJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRWJX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FSSKX
FSSKX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FSSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRWJX vs. FSSKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund (BRWJX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRWJXFSSKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.42

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.49

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

16.35

-12.02

BRWJX vs. FSSKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRWJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the FSSKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRWJX and FSSKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRWJX vs. FSSKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRWJX drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, smaller than the maximum FSSKX drawdown of -53.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRWJX and FSSKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRWJXFSSKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-53.43%

+21.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-9.20%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.84%

-20.84%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

-25.20%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

-34.37%

+2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

-2.32%

-3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-7.69%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

1.96%

+2.51%

Volatility

BRWJX vs. FSSKX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund (BRWJX) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX) at 5.62%. This indicates that BRWJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSSKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRWJXFSSKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

5.62%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

11.14%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

13.90%

+2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.37%

17.93%

+3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

18.61%

+2.24%

BRWJX vs. FSSKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRWJX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FSSKX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRWJX vs. FSSKX - Dividend Comparison

BRWJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than FSSKX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRWJX
MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund
6.37%6.63%4.91%0.61%2.48%17.39%6.83%4.52%7.81%0.82%0.39%0.35%
FSSKX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K
4.22%4.78%4.87%2.11%0.38%1.44%5.29%6.17%4.37%3.07%1.12%5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BRWJX and FSSKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BRWJX has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to FSSKX (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRWJX dropped -32.12% vs FSSKX's -53.43%.

FSSKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRWJX and FSSKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer