PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRWJX vs. FOCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRWJX vs. FOCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund (BRWJX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRWJX achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than FOCPX's 22.49% return. Over the past 10 years, BRWJX has underperformed FOCPX with an annualized return of 17.07%, while FOCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.23% annualized return.


BRWJX

1D
-1.12%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
2.79%
6M
1.25%
1Y
14.69%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
17.07%

FOCPX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
22.49%
6M
21.39%
1Y
46.76%
3Y*
32.97%
5Y*
17.13%
10Y*
23.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRWJX vs. FOCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRWJX
MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund
2.79%16.90%35.62%41.06%-29.75%28.77%30.81%32.37%-4.78%26.36%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
22.49%22.21%38.95%42.64%-32.08%24.94%46.75%39.20%-3.30%38.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BRWJX and FOCPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2015

0.94

The correlation between BRWJX and FOCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRWJX vs. FOCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRWJX
BRWJX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BRWJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRWJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRWJX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BRWJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRWJX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCPX
FOCPX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FOCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRWJX vs. FOCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund (BRWJX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRWJXFOCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.42

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

4.31

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

17.81

-14.27

BRWJX vs. FOCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRWJX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the FOCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRWJX and FOCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRWJX vs. FOCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRWJX drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, smaller than the maximum FOCPX drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRWJX and FOCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRWJXFOCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-70.25%

+38.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-11.29%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.84%

-24.82%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

-37.05%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

-37.05%

+4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.98%

-5.50%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-16.99%

+10.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

2.73%

+1.78%

Volatility

BRWJX vs. FOCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund (BRWJX) is 5.98%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that BRWJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRWJXFOCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

9.31%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

16.04%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

19.71%

-3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.38%

22.98%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

22.54%

-1.69%

BRWJX vs. FOCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRWJX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCPX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRWJX vs. FOCPX - Dividend Comparison

BRWJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than FOCPX's 6.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRWJX
MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund
6.45%6.63%4.91%0.61%2.48%17.39%6.83%4.52%7.81%0.82%0.39%0.35%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
6.35%7.78%16.76%0.05%4.06%11.53%6.23%7.58%7.93%4.86%3.24%5.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BRWJX and FOCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOCPX has higher volatility (9.31%) compared to BRWJX (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRWJX dropped -32.12% vs FOCPX's -70.25%.

FOCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRWJX and FOCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer