BRWIX vs. YACKX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX).
BRWIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Dec 30, 1985. YACKX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jul 6, 1992.
Performance
BRWIX vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BRWIX vs. YACKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRWIX AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund | -0.80% | 21.16% | 3.08% | 13.75% | -25.35% | 12.38% | 29.77% | 27.98% | -3.67% | 23.65% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 5.65% | 1.34% | 13.15% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 27.49% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRWIX achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 5.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BRWIX has underperformed YACKX with an annualized return of 9.84%, while YACKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.
BRWIX
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.90%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
YACKX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- -5.11%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BRWIX vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRWIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BRWIX vs. YACKX — Risk / Return Rank
BRWIX
YACKX
BRWIX vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRWIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 0.26 | +1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 0.42 | +1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.10 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 0.26 | +1.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 0.77 | +8.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRWIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.26 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.42 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.71 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.68 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between BRWIX and YACKX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BRWIX vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison
BRWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while YACKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRWIX AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund | 0.75% | 0.75% | 1.17% | 0.63% | 0.48% | 45.72% | 14.71% | 10.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.32% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 16.84% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
Drawdowns
BRWIX vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRWIX drawdown since its inception was -54.49%, which is greater than YACKX's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRWIX and YACKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRWIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.49% | -46.65% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -16.30% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.71% | -19.86% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.71% | -30.93% | -5.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.43% | -9.42% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.69% | -5.28% | -12.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 5.50% | -2.75% |
Volatility
BRWIX vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) at 5.19%. This indicates that BRWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BRWIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 5.19% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 19.29% | -8.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 21.08% | -3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 17.03% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 16.10% | +3.99% |