PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRUSX vs. AVALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRUSX vs. AVALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX) and Aegis Value Fund (AVALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRUSX achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than AVALX's 14.52% return. Over the past 10 years, BRUSX has underperformed AVALX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while AVALX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.99% annualized return.


BRUSX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.99%
YTD
9.10%
6M
8.76%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
9.53%

AVALX

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
14.52%
6M
13.82%
1Y
50.78%
3Y*
31.12%
5Y*
21.13%
10Y*
19.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRUSX vs. AVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRUSX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund
9.10%7.13%17.57%18.14%-10.99%13.85%33.43%9.52%-15.77%3.86%
AVALX
Aegis Value Fund
14.52%67.06%8.29%13.11%10.50%37.67%18.89%25.67%-16.95%17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BRUSX and AVALX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1998

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between BRUSX and AVALX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRUSX vs. AVALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRUSX
BRUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BRUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

AVALX
AVALX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRUSX vs. AVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX) and Aegis Value Fund (AVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRUSXAVALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.49

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

5.91

-3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.48

19.70

-14.22

BRUSX vs. AVALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the AVALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRUSX and AVALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRUSX vs. AVALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRUSX drawdown since its inception was -60.38%, smaller than the maximum AVALX drawdown of -73.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRUSX and AVALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRUSXAVALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.38%

-73.72%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.87%

-8.32%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.73%

-13.59%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.95%

-32.00%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.77%

-48.34%

-7.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-6.67%

+5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.53%

-10.94%

-2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

2.50%

+2.10%

Volatility

BRUSX vs. AVALX - Volatility Comparison

Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Aegis Value Fund (AVALX) at 5.49%. This indicates that BRUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRUSXAVALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

5.49%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

13.30%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.91%

17.37%

+4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.31%

22.27%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

22.18%

+1.22%

BRUSX vs. AVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRUSX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than AVALX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRUSX vs. AVALX - Dividend Comparison

BRUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%, more than AVALX's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVALX
Aegis Value Fund
2.04%2.34%7.07%2.23%0.16%0.00%6.62%2.36%6.18%0.00%1.45%0.04%
BRUSX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund
9.68%10.56%2.46%4.97%18.41%7.70%1.53%1.14%13.87%1.99%1.12%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRUSX and AVALX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRUSX has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to AVALX (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRUSX dropped -60.38% vs AVALX's -73.72%.

AVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRUSX and AVALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer