PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRUHX vs. MFEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRUHX vs. MFEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) and MFS Growth I (MFEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRUHX achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly higher than MFEIX's 6.29% return. Over the past 10 years, BRUHX has underperformed MFEIX with an annualized return of 11.69%, while MFEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.67% annualized return.


BRUHX

1D
0.73%
1M
4.18%
YTD
14.62%
6M
15.88%
1Y
27.07%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.69%

MFEIX

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.75%
YTD
6.29%
6M
5.95%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
17.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRUHX vs. MFEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRUHX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund
14.62%15.45%12.81%14.59%-4.15%26.24%1.68%23.72%-8.41%15.23%
MFEIX
MFS Growth I
6.29%12.34%49.67%36.15%-31.14%23.59%31.65%37.69%2.30%30.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BRUHX and MFEIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2015

0.67

The correlation between BRUHX and MFEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRUHX vs. MFEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRUHX
BRUHX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BRUHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEIX
MFEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MFEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRUHX vs. MFEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) and MFS Growth I (MFEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRUHXMFEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.21

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

1.05

+3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.52

3.43

+13.09

BRUHX vs. MFEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRUHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the MFEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRUHX and MFEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRUHXMFEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.15

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.66

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.83

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.44

+0.19

Drawdowns

BRUHX vs. MFEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRUHX drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum MFEIX drawdown of -72.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRUHX and MFEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRUHXMFEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-72.24%

+33.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-17.30%

+10.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.49%

-23.24%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.49%

-36.11%

+15.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

-36.11%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-23.73%

+19.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

5.31%

-3.62%

Volatility

BRUHX vs. MFEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) is 3.04%, while MFS Growth I (MFEIX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that BRUHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRUHXMFEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

3.59%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

12.24%

-3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

15.83%

-4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

21.90%

-5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

21.24%

-3.20%

BRUHX vs. MFEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRUHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MFEIX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRUHX vs. MFEIX - Dividend Comparison

BRUHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.59%, less than MFEIX's 14.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRUHX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund
10.59%12.14%11.32%3.61%8.44%12.82%1.85%2.40%5.04%2.26%0.71%0.96%
MFEIX
MFS Growth I
14.11%14.99%25.47%4.86%1.05%2.76%3.57%1.57%3.78%2.50%1.61%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRUHX and MFEIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEIX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to BRUHX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRUHX dropped -38.77% vs MFEIX's -72.24%.

BRUHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRUHX and MFEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer