PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRUHX vs. MALVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRUHX vs. MALVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) and BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund (MALVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BRUHX having a 19.80% return and MALVX slightly higher at 20.54%. Over the past 10 years, BRUHX has underperformed MALVX with an annualized return of 11.93%, while MALVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.


BRUHX

1D
0.11%
1M
3.13%
6M
15.30%
YTD
19.80%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
11.93%

MALVX

1D
0.23%
1M
2.32%
6M
16.81%
YTD
20.54%
1Y
34.56%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
12.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRUHX vs. MALVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRUHX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund
19.80%15.45%12.81%14.59%-4.15%26.24%1.68%23.72%-8.41%15.23%
MALVX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund
20.54%18.38%15.39%13.74%-8.68%26.51%3.91%24.74%-7.74%15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BRUHX and MALVX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2015

0.97

The correlation between BRUHX and MALVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRUHX vs. MALVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRUHX
BRUHX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BRUHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MALVX
MALVX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MALVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MALVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MALVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MALVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MALVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRUHX vs. MALVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) and BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund (MALVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRUHXMALVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.55

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

5.23

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.02

23.76

-7.75

BRUHX vs. MALVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRUHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the MALVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRUHX and MALVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRUHX vs. MALVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRUHX drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum MALVX drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRUHX and MALVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRUHXMALVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-55.21%

+16.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-6.53%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.49%

-16.13%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.49%

-19.73%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

-37.12%

-1.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-8.72%

+4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.44%

+0.25%

Volatility

BRUHX vs. MALVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) is 3.77%, while BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund (MALVX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that BRUHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MALVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRUHXMALVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

4.15%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

8.91%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

11.29%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

14.81%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

17.24%

+0.73%

BRUHX vs. MALVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRUHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MALVX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRUHX vs. MALVX - Dividend Comparison

BRUHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.13%, more than MALVX's 7.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRUHX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund
10.13%12.14%11.32%3.61%8.44%12.82%1.85%2.40%5.04%2.26%0.71%0.96%
MALVX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund
7.66%9.23%14.33%2.84%5.96%17.48%1.68%3.92%12.95%0.43%1.38%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, BRUHX and MALVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MALVX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to BRUHX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRUHX dropped -38.77% vs MALVX's -55.21%.

MALVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRUHX and MALVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer