PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRUHX vs. IRVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRUHX vs. IRVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S (IRVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRUHX achieves a 21.20% return, which is significantly higher than IRVSX's 19.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BRUHX having a 12.09% annualized return and IRVSX not far behind at 11.52%.


BRUHX

1D
0.37%
1M
1.66%
6M
15.24%
YTD
21.20%
1Y
31.29%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
12.09%
ALL TIME*
11.79%

IRVSX

1D
0.79%
1M
1.65%
6M
14.44%
YTD
19.71%
1Y
31.48%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
11.52%
ALL TIME*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BRUHX vs. IRVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRUHX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund
21.20%15.45%12.81%14.59%-4.15%26.24%1.68%23.72%-8.41%15.23%
IRVSX
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S
19.71%17.81%14.66%9.98%-5.71%22.68%1.11%25.45%-6.83%13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BRUHX and IRVSX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2015

0.94

The correlation between BRUHX and IRVSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRUHX vs. IRVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRUHX
BRUHX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BRUHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IRVSX
IRVSX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IRVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IRVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRUHX vs. IRVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S (IRVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRUHXIRVSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.53

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

4.94

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.50

21.20

-3.71

BRUHX vs. IRVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRUHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the IRVSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRUHX and IRVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRUHX vs. IRVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRUHX drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than IRVSX's maximum drawdown of -35.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRUHX and IRVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRUHXIRVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-35.70%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-6.70%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.49%

-13.41%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.49%

-18.49%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

-35.70%

-3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.31%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-3.86%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.54%

+0.11%

Volatility

BRUHX vs. IRVSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) is 2.33%, while Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S (IRVSX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that BRUHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRVSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRUHXIRVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

3.07%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

8.55%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.50%

11.08%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

14.25%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

16.80%

+1.17%

BRUHX vs. IRVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRUHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than IRVSX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRUHX vs. IRVSX - Dividend Comparison

BRUHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.02%, more than IRVSX's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRUHX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund
10.02%12.14%11.32%3.61%8.44%12.82%1.85%2.40%5.04%2.26%0.71%0.96%
IRVSX
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Index Portfolio Class S
3.45%27.68%3.39%1.77%1.19%1.75%3.72%5.71%6.06%1.74%2.76%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRUHX and IRVSX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRVSX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to BRUHX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRUHX dropped -38.77% vs IRVSX's -35.70%.

IRVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRUHX and IRVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer