PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRUHX vs. AVLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRUHX vs. AVLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (AVLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRUHX achieves a 17.37% return, which is significantly lower than AVLVX's 23.14% return.


BRUHX

1D
1.38%
1M
3.32%
YTD
17.37%
6M
16.04%
1Y
27.30%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
12.58%

AVLVX

1D
0.93%
1M
2.04%
YTD
23.14%
6M
21.60%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
23.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRUHX vs. AVLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BRUHX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund
17.37%15.45%12.81%14.59%10.37%
AVLVX
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class
23.14%15.23%16.93%16.75%8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BRUHX and AVLVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

0.94

The correlation between BRUHX and AVLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRUHX vs. AVLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRUHX
BRUHX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BRUHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLVX
AVLVX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AVLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRUHX vs. AVLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (AVLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRUHXAVLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.58

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

6.85

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.78

27.13

-10.35

BRUHX vs. AVLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRUHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the AVLVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRUHX and AVLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRUHX vs. AVLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRUHX drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than AVLVX's maximum drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRUHX and AVLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRUHXAVLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-19.51%

-19.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-6.01%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.49%

-19.51%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-3.16%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.51%

+0.19%

Volatility

BRUHX vs. AVLVX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund (BRUHX) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (AVLVX) have volatilities of 3.94% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRUHXAVLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

4.09%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

9.49%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

12.75%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

16.53%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

16.53%

+1.48%

BRUHX vs. AVLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRUHX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLVX's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRUHX vs. AVLVX - Dividend Comparison

BRUHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.34%, more than AVLVX's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVLVX
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class
2.69%3.32%1.61%1.59%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BRUHX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund
10.34%12.14%11.32%3.61%8.44%12.82%1.85%2.40%5.04%2.26%0.71%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BRUHX and AVLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVLVX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to BRUHX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRUHX dropped -38.77% vs AVLVX's -19.51%.

AVLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRUHX and AVLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer