BRTR vs. LTPZ
BRTR (Blackrock Total Return ETF) and LTPZ (PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BlackRock, while LTPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). BRTR is actively managed, while LTPZ is passively managed. Over the past year, BRTR returned 5.97% vs 4.72% for LTPZ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BRTR charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LTPZ.
Performance
BRTR vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BRTR having a 0.40% return and LTPZ slightly higher at 0.41%.
BRTR
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 5.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTPZ
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- -0.79%
- 5Y*
- -5.24%
- 10Y*
- 0.75%
BRTR vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BRTR Blackrock Total Return ETF | 0.40% | 8.11% | 1.29% | 0.43% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 0.41% | 4.00% | -4.80% | -1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRTR and LTPZ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023 | 0.85 |
The correlation between BRTR and LTPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRTR vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank
BRTR
LTPZ
BRTR vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRTR | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 0.51 | +1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | 0.78 | +1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.09 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 0.68 | +1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 1.48 | +4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRTR | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.51 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.21 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
BRTR vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRTR drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRTR and LTPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRTR | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -40.99% | +35.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.26% | -7.00% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -32.74% | +31.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -12.41% | +11.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 3.20% | -2.12% |
Volatility
BRTR vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) is 1.28%, while PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a volatility of 2.32%. This indicates that BRTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRTR | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 2.32% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 6.41% | -3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68% | 9.26% | -5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 15.89% | -11.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 15.07% | -10.38% |
BRTR vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRTR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRTR vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
BRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than LTPZ's 5.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRTR Blackrock Total Return ETF | 4.73% | 4.86% | 5.58% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 5.23% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRTR and LTPZ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTPZ has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to BRTR (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRTR dropped -5.07% vs LTPZ's -40.99%.
On 1-year performance, BRTR leads with 5.97% vs 4.72% for LTPZ. On fees, LTPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BRTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BRTR has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LTPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for BRTR.
LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 4.73% for BRTR.
BRTR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while LTPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for BRTR and 0.20% for LTPZ.
BRTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRTR and LTPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer