BRTR vs. CGNG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BRTR (Blackrock Total Return ETF) and CGNG (Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BRTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BlackRock, while CGNG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BRTR returned 5.46% vs 33.89% for CGNG. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BRTR charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for CGNG.

Performance

BRTR vs. CGNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRTR achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than CGNG's 15.66% return.

BRTR

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 0.61%
• 1Y: 5.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGNG

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 15.66%
• 6M: 16.77%
• 1Y: 33.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRTR vs. CGNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BRTR Blackrock Total Return ETF	0.51%	8.11%	1.28%
CGNG Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF	15.66%	29.78%	-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BRTR and CGNG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024	0.23

The correlation between BRTR and CGNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BRTR vs. CGNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BRTR	CGNG
Energy	25.1%	3.5%
Communication Services	23.8%	10.4%
Financial Services	22.7%	16.2%
Basic Materials	8.7%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	9.8%
Technology	6.7%	31.4%
Real Estate	2.2%	1.3%
Utilities	1.8%	1.8%
Industrials	1.5%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.8%
Healthcare	-	3.5%

Return for Risk

BRTR vs. CGNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRTR

BRTR Risk / Return Rank: 40
BRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
BRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
BRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CGNG

CGNG Risk / Return Rank: 56
CGNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CGNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CGNG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CGNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CGNG Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRTR vs. CGNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRTR	CGNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.89	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.66	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.35	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	2.48	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.07	10.47	-5.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRTR vs. CGNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the CGNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRTR and CGNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRTR	CGNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.89	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	1.26	-0.37

Drawdowns

BRTR vs. CGNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRTR drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, smaller than the maximum CGNG drawdown of -15.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRTR and CGNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRTR	CGNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-15.90%	+10.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.26%	-13.75%	+10.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.58%	-1.68%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.35%	-2.84%	+1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	3.25%	-2.17%

Volatility

BRTR vs. CGNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) is 1.27%, while Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that BRTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRTR	CGNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.27%	6.98%	-5.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.77%	15.67%	-12.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.68%	18.05%	-14.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.69%	18.15%	-13.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.69%	18.15%	-13.46%

BRTR vs. CGNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRTR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CGNG's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

BRTR vs. CGNG - Dividend Comparison

BRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than CGNG's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BRTR Blackrock Total Return ETF	4.72%	4.86%	5.58%	0.22%
CGNG Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF	0.59%	0.68%	0.27%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRTR and CGNG in my portfolio?

BRTR and CGNG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRTR or CGNG?

CGNG has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to BRTR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRTR dropped -5.07% vs CGNG's -15.90%.

Which ETF is better, BRTR or CGNG?

On 1-year performance, CGNG leads with 33.89% vs 5.46% for BRTR. On fees, BRTR is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, BRTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BRTR or CGNG?

Over the 1-year period, CGNG has performed better with a 33.89% return vs 5.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BRTR or CGNG?

BRTR is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for CGNG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BRTR or CGNG?

BRTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.59% for CGNG.

What is the main difference between BRTR and CGNG?

BRTR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while CGNG is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for BRTR and 0.64% for CGNG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.