PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRTR vs. BRLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRTR vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRTR achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than BRLN's 1.35% return.


BRTR

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.28%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BRLN

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.35%
6M
2.23%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRTR vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BRTR
Blackrock Total Return ETF
0.40%8.11%1.29%0.43%
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
1.35%5.38%7.49%0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BRTR and BRLN is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRTR vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRTR
BRTR Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BRLN
BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRTR vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRTRBRLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.56

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

9.95

-4.39

BRTR vs. BRLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the BRLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRTR and BRLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRTRBRLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.68

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

2.19

-1.31

Drawdowns

BRTR vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRTR drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, which is greater than BRLN's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRTR and BRLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRTRBRLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-3.85%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-2.00%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-0.21%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-0.31%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

0.51%

+0.57%

Volatility

BRTR vs. BRLN - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) at 0.81%. This indicates that BRTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRTRBRLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.81%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

2.24%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68%

3.06%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.69%

3.73%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.69%

3.73%

+0.96%

BRTR vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRTR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRTR vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison

BRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than BRLN's 6.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
6.35%6.50%7.87%9.06%1.48%
BRTR
Blackrock Total Return ETF
4.73%4.86%5.58%0.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRTR and BRLN have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRTR has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to BRLN (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRTR dropped -5.07% vs BRLN's -3.85%.

On 1-year performance, BRTR leads with 5.97% vs 5.10% for BRLN. On fees, BRTR is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, BRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BRTR has performed better with a 5.97% return vs 5.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BRTR is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BRLN.

BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 4.73% for BRTR.

BRTR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BRLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for BRTR and 0.55% for BRLN.

BRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRTR and BRLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer